Decoding FinDatEx Templates: EMT, EPT, and EET for European Fund Data

Section 1: The Engine of European Fund Data Interoperability: An Introduction to FinDatEx

The European fund industry operates within a complex and ever-evolving regulatory framework. Directives and regulations such as the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulation, and the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) have imposed significant data exchange requirements on financial market participants. This intricate web of rules necessitates streamlined, standardised communication channels to ensure compliance, enhance operational efficiency, and maintain market integrity. It is against this backdrop that Financial Data Exchange Templates (FinDatEx) emerged as a pivotal initiative, driving interoperability in European fund data.

 

1.1 The Imperative for Standardisation: FinDatEx’s Genesis, Mission, and Key Backers

The period leading up to the establishment of FinDatEx was characterised by a growing recognition that fragmented and bespoke data exchange processes were unsustainable. The sheer volume of data required by regulations like MiFID II, often described as a “massive data exercise”, underscored the urgent need for a unified approach. Without standardisation, financial institutions faced mounting operational burdens, increased risks of non-compliance, and significant inefficiencies in communicating vital product information.

FinDatEx was formally established in April 2019 as a joint initiative by prominent European financial services industry associations. Its core mission is to coordinate, organise, and execute standardisation work through the development and dissemination of technical templates. These templates are designed to facilitate the exchange of data between stakeholders, particularly concerning information mandated by European financial market legislation. The initiative built upon the successful informal collaboration within the European Working Group (EWG), which had already begun to address some of these data exchange challenges.

The founding members of FinDatEx represent a broad cross-section of the European financial industry, including the European Fund and Asset Management Association (EFAMA), the European Banking Federation (EBF), Insurance Europe, the European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG), the European Association of Co-operative Banks (EACB), and the European Structured Investment Products Association (EUSIPA). The subsequent inclusion of the European Association of Public Banks (EAPB) in October 2019 and PensionsEurope in April 2021 further expanded its representative base. This wide-ranging support from key industry bodies is fundamental to FinDatEx’s credibility and the widespread adoption of its templates. The collective expertise ensures that the templates are practical, address diverse stakeholder needs, and are reflective of the operational realities of the market.

A cornerstone of the FinDatEx philosophy is that its templates are not mandatory, are provided to the industry free of charge, and are devoid of any intellectual property rights. This approach fosters inclusivity, openness, and transparency, encouraging broad participation and adoption across all sectors affected by the standardisation process. The development of these templates is a proactive, industry-led response to manage the complexities of regulatory data exchange. Rather than awaiting prescriptive solutions from regulators on data formats, the industry itself has collaboratively built these tools. The voluntary adoption, coupled with their extensive use and frequent updates, demonstrates the practical necessity and value perceived by market participants.

The “free of charge” model, where templates are developed by industry experts working pro bono with secretarial support from member associations, has been instrumental in achieving widespread adoption by removing cost as a barrier. However, the dynamic nature of financial regulation, with continuous updates and new requirements (such as those under SFDR Level 2 or ongoing MiFID II adjustments), necessitates sustained and intensive effort in template development and maintenance. This reliance on voluntary expert contributions and association resources, while ensuring neutrality and industry ownership, implies that the pace and scope of development are contingent on the availability of these resources. This may, at times, lead to a prioritisation of certain templates or features, reflecting the collective judgment of the participating bodies on the most pressing industry needs.

 

1.2 Operational Framework: FinDatEx Governance, Working Groups, and Template Development Process

The operational integrity and effectiveness of FinDatEx are underpinned by a well-defined governance structure and a transparent template development process. At the apex of its governance is the Steering Group, which comprises senior representatives from all of FinDatEx’s EU member associations. This body holds the primary decision-making authority, responsible for determining the work programme, including the initiation of new templates and revisions to existing ones. The Steering Group also formally endorses the final templates before their publication. The chairmanship and secretariat functions of the Steering Group are often provided by one of the member associations; for example, EFAMA currently fulfils these roles.

To manage the technical intricacies of template development, the Steering Group establishes Technical Working Groups (TWGs). Each TWG is dedicated to one or more specific templates or regulatory areas. These groups are populated by technical experts nominated by the member associations and may include other relevant stakeholders to ensure comprehensive expertise. Key TWGs include:

  • MiFID Technical Working Group: Manages the European MiFID Template (EMT) and the European Feedback Template (EFT).
  • PRIIPs Technical Working Group: Oversees the European PRIIPs Template (EPT) and the Comfort European PRIIPs Template (CEPT).
  • ESG Technical Working Group: Focuses on the European ESG Template (EET).
  • Solvency II Technical Working Group: Manages the Tripartite Template (TPT).

 

The template development and revision process within FinDatEx is designed to be methodical and consultative. It typically involves the following stages:

  1. Monitoring and Need Identification: TWGs actively monitor legislative and regulatory developments, including new guidelines from European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), to ascertain whether existing templates require updates or if new templates are needed.
  2. Drafting and Discussion: Once a need is identified, the relevant TWG engages in detailed discussions to draft the new template or the revisions to an existing one. The intensity of this phase, including the number of meetings, depends on the scope and complexity of the changes. Group members are expected to contribute actively through verbal and written comments.
  3. Public Consultation: After a TWG finalises a draft, it is published on the FinDatEx website under the “work in progress” section. This opens the draft for public consultation, allowing a broad range of stakeholders—including those not directly involved in the TWG, members of FinDatEx associations, and any other interested parties—to provide feedback. FinDatEx ensures that consultation periods are adequate to allow for meaningful input, considering relevant regulatory timelines.
  4. Finalisation and Endorsement: The feedback received during the public consultation is reviewed by the TWG and incorporated into a final draft of the template. This final draft is then submitted to the Steering Group for endorsement.
  5. Publication: Following endorsement by the Steering Group, the new or updated template is officially published on the FinDatEx website. The website also serves as an archive for all previous template versions and consultation documents.

 

This inclusive and transparent methodology is a critical factor in the widespread acceptance and utility of FinDatEx templates. However, this commitment to broad stakeholder engagement must be continually balanced against the need for agility in a rapidly changing regulatory environment. While the involvement of numerous associations and experts ensures that templates are robust and meet diverse requirements, the process of achieving consensus on complex technical details can be time-consuming. The fast pace of regulatory evolution, exemplified by the frequent updates to the EET, demands swift responses. FinDatEx navigates this by maintaining a structured yet adaptable approach. For instance, the decision to discontinue the dedicated MiFID ESG working group and integrate its responsibilities within the main ESG TWG could be seen as a move to streamline efforts and enhance efficiency in addressing the comprehensive nature of ESG-related data requirements.

 

1.3 From Fragmentation to Unity: How FinDatEx Streamlined European Data Exchange Efforts

Prior to the establishment of FinDatEx, efforts towards standardising financial data exchange in Europe were often more fragmented and less formalised. FinDatEx built upon and significantly professionalised the work of earlier informal collaborations, most notably the European Working Group (EWG). The EWG, an informal affiliation of industry participants, had already initiated foundational work on templates for MiFID and PRIIPs regulations.

The creation of FinDatEx in 2019 marked a pivotal shift towards a more structured, official, and unified platform for these standardisation efforts. By bringing together a wide array of influential European financial industry associations under a common governance framework, FinDatEx provided the necessary impetus to consolidate and harmonise template development across multiple key regulations, including MiFID II, PRIIPs, Solvency II, and the burgeoning requirements of SFDR. This unification was crucial. It ensured the development of a coherent suite of interoperable templates, rather than potentially disparate or conflicting standards emerging from various sector-specific or national initiatives.

The transition from the EWG to the more formal FinDatEx structure can be viewed as a necessary evolutionary step in the European financial industry’s approach to managing regulatory data. The increasing scope, granularity, and complexity of EU financial regulations demanded a more robust, official, and coordinated mechanism than an informal working group could sustain. FinDatEx was launched to provide this “improved governance structure”, empowering the industry to “collectively decide on the need to develop or disband standards” in a systematic manner. 

This formalisation ensures broader industry representation through its member associations, a transparent and documented development process, and official endorsement of templates by key European financial bodies. These elements are critical for fostering the widespread adoption and trust necessary for such standards to be effective across the diverse European financial landscape. This evolution signifies a maturation in the industry’s collective response to regulatory data challenges, recognising that sustainable, long-term solutions require permanent, collaborative infrastructure rather than ad-hoc initiatives.

Decoding FinDatEx Templates: EMT, EPT, and EET for European Fund Data

Section 2: Demystifying Core FinDatEx Templates: A Deep Dive

FinDatEx has developed a suite of templates, each tailored to specific European regulations, yet all contributing to the overarching goal of standardised data exchange. Understanding the purpose, content, and application of these templates is essential for compliance officers, fund administrators, and data management professionals.

 

2.1 The European MiFID Template (EMT): Powering MiFID II Compliance

Regulatory Bedrock & Business Need

The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II), which became effective in January 2018, significantly reshaped the European financial landscape by introducing comprehensive requirements aimed at enhancing investor protection, market transparency, and product governance. A critical component of MiFID II is the obligation for product manufacturers (such as asset managers) to provide detailed information to distributors. This information pertains to the costs and charges associated with financial instruments and the definition of their target market. The European MiFID Template (EMT) was developed by FinDatEx to standardise this crucial data flow, enabling efficient and consistent communication between these market participants.

 

Key Data Constituents

The EMT is structured to convey a minimum set of data essential for MiFID II compliance. Its main components include:

  • Target Market Information: This section defines the specific cohort of investors for whom a financial product is deemed suitable. It includes criteria such as the investor type (e.g., retail, professional, eligible counterparty), their knowledge and experience concerning the product type, their ability to bear potential financial losses, their overall risk tolerance, and their investment objectives and needs.
  • Costs and Charges: The EMT mandates detailed disclosure of all costs and charges associated with a financial instrument. This includes both ex-ante (information provided before an investment is made) and ex-post (information provided after an investment has been made) cost breakdowns. This transparency is vital for investors to understand the total expense of an investment.
  • General Financial Instrument Information: This part of the template contains basic identifying data for the financial instrument, ensuring clear product recognition.

 

These data fields are fundamental for distributors to fulfil their MiFID II obligations. For instance, target market information is crucial for assessing the suitability and appropriateness of a product for individual clients, while detailed cost disclosures enable distributors to provide clear and comprehensive information to investors before they make investment decisions. To ensure machine readability and facilitate automated processing, the EMT is typically provided in a pipe-delimited.csv file format, although an Excel version is often available for convenience.

 

Practical Application

Asset managers located in major European fund centres, such as Frankfurt and Luxembourg, routinely use the EMT to transmit standardised product data to distributors operating across various European jurisdictions. This standardised approach streamlines the exchange of information for a vast number of financial instruments, enhancing efficiency and reducing the operational burden associated with MiFID II compliance.

 

Staying Current: EMT Versions and Recent Updates

The EMT is not a static document; it has evolved through several iterations to reflect changes in the regulatory landscape and to address practical implementation feedback. Notable versions include V1, V2 (specifically for structured products), V3, V3.1, V4.0, V4.1, and the latest V4.2.6

 

  • EMT V4.2 (Published April 2024): This version integrates the preceding V4.1 with an additional UK-specific section. This new section caters to detailed ongoing cost disclosure requirements particular to the UK market, reflecting regulatory divergence following Brexit and the implementation of specific UK regulations such as the Consumer Duty. EMT V4.2 became mandatory for use within the UK market from June 30, 2024, at which point V4.1 was retired for UK purposes. However, both V4.2 and V4.0 may remain valid for use in parallel for products not distributed in the UK.
  • EMT V4.1 (Published April 2023): This version introduced new fields to support the price and value outcomes required by the UK Consumer Duty. It also addressed divergences in PRIIPs transaction cost methodologies between the UK and EU regimes.
  • EMT V4.0 (Published March 2022): A significant update, EMT V4.0 replaced both V3 and V3.1. A key change in this version was the removal of ESG-related data fields, which were migrated to the newly introduced European ESG Template (EET).

 

The version history of the EMT clearly illustrates the dynamic nature of financial regulation and FinDatEx’s ongoing efforts to adapt the template. These adaptations ensure that the EMT remains a relevant and effective tool for MiFID II compliance, accommodating new EU-wide requirements (like the initial handling of SFDR impacts) and significant national regulatory shifts (such as UK-specific rules post-Brexit).

The evolution of the EMT serves as a clear example of how regulatory adaptation and cross-border complexities manifest in data standards. While the primary goal of the EMT is to standardise MiFID II data exchange, its journey through various versions demonstrates a continuous effort to keep pace with a shifting regulatory environment. Specific updates, such as those in V3.1 to address SFDR Level 1 requirements, the migration of ESG elements to the EET in V4.0, and the incorporation of UK Consumer Duty requirements in V4.1 and V4.2, highlight this adaptability. The necessity for UK-specific sections in recent versions directly reflects the regulatory divergence post-Brexit and the inherent challenge of maintaining a truly pan-European standard while also accommodating distinct national regulatory demands. 

This creates an additional layer of operational complexity for firms involved in cross-border distribution, as they may need to manage and populate different sections or slightly varied versions of what is ostensibly the “same” template depending on the end market. This underscores the intricate balancing act FinDatEx performs in striving for European harmonisation while acknowledging significant national regulatory specificities.

 

2.2 The European PRIIPs Template (EPT): Standardising PRIIPs KID Disclosures

Regulatory Bedrock & Business Need

The Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) Regulation mandates that manufacturers of such products provide retail investors with a Key Information Document (KID) prior to any investment. The KID is a standardised document designed to help retail investors understand and compare the key features, risks, costs, and potential performance of different investment products. The European PRIIPs Template (EPT) was developed by FinDatEx to facilitate the exchange of the complex data sets required to compile these KIDs. It is particularly crucial for insurers offering multi-option products (MOPs), where underlying investment options may be managed by different entities.

 

Key Data Constituents

The EPT is a comprehensive template designed to provide all necessary inputs for the PRIIPs KID. Its core data elements include:

  • Risk Information: This includes the Summary Risk Indicator (SRI), which is a numerical scale from 1 to 7 representing the overall riskiness of the product. It also details the underlying market risk measure (MRM) and credit risk measure (CRM).
  • Cost Disclosures: The EPT requires a detailed breakdown of all costs associated with the PRIIP. This encompasses one-off costs (such as entry and exit charges), ongoing costs (like management fees and transaction costs), and any incidental costs (such as performance fees). The template also facilitates the calculation of the Reduction in Yield (RIY), which shows the impact of total costs on the potential investment return.
  • Performance Scenarios: The EPT includes data for generating performance scenarios, which illustrate potential returns under various market conditions: stress, unfavourable, moderate, and favourable. These scenarios are typically projected over different time horizons, including the recommended holding period.
  • General Product Information: This includes essential details such as the recommended holding period for the product, its specific PRIIPs category, and other identifying information.

 

The EPT is designed for machine readability, commonly using.csv or.xls formats, to allow for automated processing by insurers and financial platforms. It ensures that the data used to populate PRIIPs KIDs is consistent and accurate. The template also contains data fields that are common with the PRIIPs KID of the underlying investment option itself, ensuring alignment.

 

Practical Application

Asset managers, as manufacturers of underlying investment options, populate and provide EPT data to insurance companies and other distributors who then package these options into PRIIPs for sale to retail investors. This standardised flow of information is critical for ensuring that the final KIDs presented to investors are based on consistent and reliable underlying data.

 

Staying Current: EPT Versions and Recent Updates

Like other FinDatEx templates, the EPT has been subject to revisions to align with regulatory developments and industry feedback. Key versions include EPT V2.0 and V2.1.6

  • EPT V2.1 (Published September 2022): This version introduced additional fields specifically to address the requirements of the UK market, following divergences in the UK PRIIPs regime after Brexit. For example, the 00001_EPT_Version field can now indicate ‘V21’ (supporting both EU and UK KIDs) or ‘V21UK’ (supporting UK KIDs only).
  • EPT V2.0 (Published February 2022): This update was developed to reflect the revised EU PRIIPs Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS).

 

These updates are primarily driven by changes in the PRIIPs RTS and the need to accommodate national specificities, such as those arising from the UK’s departure from the EU. Alongside the standard EPT, FinDatEx also oversees the Comfort European PRIIPs Template (CEPT). The CEPT allows for the exchange of additional data points beyond the minimum required for the EPT, subject to bilateral agreements between the data provider and recipient.

The EPT serves a dual function within the European financial ecosystem. Its primary role is to facilitate regulatory compliance by providing a standardised format for the data necessary to create PRIIPs KIDs. However, it also acts as a critical data bridge, particularly between the asset management industry and the insurance sector. This is especially pertinent for insurers constructing Multi-Option Products (MOPs), who rely on data from various underlying investment options managed by different asset managers. The template’s content, covering risks, performance scenarios, and costs, directly maps to the core components of the KID. 

The existence of both the standard EPT (covering minimum data requirements) and the CEPT (allowing for more extensive data exchange via bilateral agreements) points to a tiered approach to data exchange. This structure balances the need to meet mandatory regulatory disclosures with the more comprehensive data requirements that specific users, such as insurers, may have for their product structuring and risk management processes. This highlights that baseline regulatory data may not always suffice for all practical inter-sectoral data exchange needs.

 

2.3 The European ESG Template (EET): Navigating Sustainable Finance Disclosures (SFDR)

Regulatory Bedrock & Business Need

The European Union’s sustainable finance agenda has introduced a raft of new disclosure requirements, primarily through the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the Taxonomy Regulation. These regulations compel financial market participants and financial advisers to disclose detailed information on how they integrate sustainability risks, consider adverse sustainability impacts, and, for products with environmental or social characteristics or sustainable investment objectives, provide specific details on these aspects. The European ESG Template (EET), first published by FinDatEx in March 2022, was developed to standardise the exchange of this complex and granular ESG data between market participants.

 

Key Data Constituents

The EET is a comprehensive template, with some versions containing over 600 data fields. This extensive scope is necessary to cover the wide range of disclosures mandated by SFDR and related regulations. Key data categories include:

  • SFDR Product Classification: Indication of whether a financial product is classified under Article 6 (no specific ESG focus), Article 8 (promotes environmental or social characteristics), or Article 9 (has sustainable investment as its objective) of SFDR.
  • Principal Adverse Impact (PAI) Indicators: Data related to the consideration and disclosure of principal adverse impacts of investment decisions on sustainability factors. This includes quantitative data on various mandatory and optional indicators, such as greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity impact, water usage, board gender diversity, and exposure to controversial weapons.
  • EU Taxonomy Alignment: Information on the extent to which investments within the financial product are aligned with environmentally sustainable economic activities as defined by the EU Taxonomy Regulation. This includes specific disclosures related to investments in fossil gas and nuclear energy activities, where applicable.
  • Sustainability Preferences: Data points designed to help distributors assess and match financial products with clients’ sustainability preferences, as required under the delegated acts complementing MiFID II and the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD).
  • Screening Criteria: Details on any positive or negative screening policies applied by the financial product (e.g., exclusions related to specific sectors like tobacco or controversial weapons, or inclusion based on best-in-class ESG performance).

 

The EET enables product manufacturers, primarily asset managers, to provide this standardised ESG data to distributors, insurers, fund-of-funds investors, and other financial market participants. This allows the recipients to fulfil their own SFDR reporting obligations, conduct PAI reporting at entity and product levels, and meet client suitability requirements related to ESG.

 

Practical Application & Rapid Adoption

Since its introduction, the EET has seen remarkably rapid adoption across the European fund industry. This is particularly evident in major fund domiciles like Luxembourg, where funds have embraced the EET to meet their SFDR compliance obligations from 2022 onwards. The template has become a critical component of the product distribution ecosystem, as many distributors now require a completed EET from asset managers before considering their products for distribution.

 

Staying Current: EET Versions and Recent Updates

Reflecting the evolving and highly detailed nature of SFDR Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) and ongoing clarifications, the EET has been the most frequently updated of the core FinDatEx templates.

  • EET V1.1.3 (Published December 2024): This version introduced minor amendments to align with ESMA’s fund naming guidelines, ensure compliance with Paris-Aligned Benchmark (PAB) and Climate Transition Benchmark (CTB) requirements, and incorporate updates to the German MiFID ESG target market concept. FinDatEx recommends its use from January 1, 2025, with V1.1.2 to be decommissioned from July 1, 2025.
  • EET V1.1.2 (Published December 2023): This version included typo corrections, adjustments to the mandatory/conditional status for certain transitional PAI data fields, and the introduction of two new data fields related to the frequency of PAI reporting and a snapshot list of invested countries for sovereign exposures.
  • EET V1.1.1 (Published January 2023): This update added supplementary data fields specifically for investments in fossil gas and nuclear activities, as well as fields for complementary PAI information.
  • EET V1.1 (Published October 2022): This version updated V1.0 to reflect the applicability of the SFDR Level 2 RTS from January 1, 2023.
  • EET V1.0 (Published March 2022): This was the inaugural version of the EET, designed to facilitate the exchange of data required under SFDR Level 1, the Taxonomy Regulation, and the ESG-related aspects of MiFID II and IDD.

 

To support the industry in implementing these complex templates, FinDatEx has provided resources such as explanatory recordings and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for the EET. Additionally, industry bodies like The Investing and Savings Alliance (TISA) have published best practice guides to aid in the completion of the EET.

The introduction and rapid evolution of the EET have acted as a significant catalyst for the maturation of data infrastructure within the sustainable finance domain. The SFDR and Taxonomy Regulation brought forth complex and granular ESG data requirements, often with challenging implementation timelines. The EET, with its extensive array of data fields (approaching 600 in some versions), quickly became the indispensable standard for exchanging this vital information. Initially, financial market participants faced considerable challenges related to sourcing reliable ESG data, ensuring data quality across providers, interpreting the nuances of numerous fields, and managing the aggregation of this data at scale. 

However, the widespread adoption and the iterative development cycle of the EET compelled firms to rapidly enhance their internal ESG data collection mechanisms, data management processes, and reporting capabilities. This has often involved significant investments in technology, forging collaborations with multiple specialist ESG data providers, and strengthening internal data governance frameworks. 

Consequently, while the EET is a direct response to regulatory mandates, it has also played a proactive role in accelerating the development of more sophisticated ESG data infrastructure and processes across the financial industry. This has pushed the sector towards a higher degree of data maturity in sustainable finance more swiftly than might have occurred if firms had pursued individual, proprietary solutions. This, in turn, establishes a more robust foundation for meaningful ESG integration and transparent reporting that extends beyond mere compliance.

 

2.4 Supporting the Insurance Sector: The Tripartite Template (TPT)

Brief Overview: Purpose and Scope under Solvency II

Beyond MiFID II, PRIIPs, and SFDR, the European insurance sector operates under its own comprehensive regulatory regime, Solvency II. This framework sets out capital adequacy and risk management standards for insurance and reinsurance undertakings. A key aspect of Solvency II is the requirement for insurers to have a detailed understanding of the risk profile of their investments, often necessitating a “look-through” approach to the underlying assets of investment funds in their portfolios. The Tripartite Template (TPT), managed by FinDatEx’s Solvency II Technical Working Group, is specifically designed to address these data requirements. It standardises the exchange of portfolio composition data from fund managers to insurers, enabling the latter to perform the necessary look-through analysis and calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) accurately.

 

Key Data Constituents

The TPT provides granular information on fund holdings, including details on asset types, identification codes, valuation, and various risk parameters. This data is essential for insurers to apply the standard formula or internal models for SCR calculation under Solvency II.40

Staying Current: Overview of TPT Versions and Recent Updates:

The TPT has undergone several revisions to keep pace with regulatory interpretations, evolving market practices, and specific industry needs.

  • TPT V7 (Published December 2024, effective from April 2025): This latest version incorporates significant updates to align with recent Solvency II regulatory changes and address key industry challenges. Enhancements include improved support for SCR calculations related to bonds with optional redemption dates (such as step-up callable bonds) and bonds or loans with payment-in-kind (PIK) features. It also facilitates SCR calculation and Quantitative Reporting Template (QRT) production for infrastructure investments. A notable change is the incorporation of dual NACE codification, requiring both NACE V2.0 (currently used by EIOPA) and NACE V2.1 (mandatory from January 2025 under EU requirements). Various data description refinements were also made to enhance accuracy and usability.
  • TPT V6 (Published January 2022): This version introduced relatively minor changes compared to its predecessor (V5). Key additions included two new data fields to facilitate the consideration of collateral eligibility and market valuation in SCR calculations for insurance companies. Some minor corrections were also implemented for existing data points, and additional guidelines were issued for modelling certain derivative transactions.

 

The continuous updates to the TPT underscore FinDatEx’s commitment to ensuring the template remains a robust and relevant tool for Solvency II reporting, adapting to both overarching regulatory shifts and specific technical challenges faced by the insurance and asset management industries in calculating and reporting solvency capital.

The evolution of the TPT mirrors the deepening granularity and sophistication of prudential regulation under Solvency II. The directive mandates that insurers possess a meticulous understanding of the risks embedded in their investment portfolios, frequently requiring a look-through to the individual underlying assets of the investment funds they hold. The TPT is the standardised conduit for this detailed data exchange between asset managers and insurers. 

Successive updates to the TPT, such as V6 incorporating specific fields for collateral details, and V7 further refining SCR calculations for complex instruments like callable bonds, PIK features, and infrastructure assets, alongside the introduction of dual NACE codes for economic activity classification, clearly indicate an increasing regulatory and industry demand for more precise and specific data points. This trend reflects both the growing complexity of financial instruments held by insurers and the continuous push by regulators for more accurate risk assessment and capital adequacy calculations under the Solvency II framework. 

Consequently, asset managers catering to insurance clients face an escalating responsibility to provide highly detailed and specialised portfolio data via the TPT. This necessitates sophisticated data management systems within asset management firms and a thorough understanding of the nuances of Solvency II requirements, extending well beyond typical investor reporting obligations. The TPT, therefore, functions as a critical channel for this heightened regulatory scrutiny into the composition and risk characteristics of fund portfolios.

Section 3: FinDatEx in Action: Enabling Cross-Border Fund Distribution and Regulatory Alignment

The FinDatEx templates are not merely theoretical constructs; they are actively deployed across the European financial ecosystem, playing a crucial role in enabling smoother cross-border fund distribution and fostering greater regulatory alignment. Their impact is felt in major financial hubs and extends to interactions with key non-EU markets.

 

3.1 Streamlining Data Flows Across European Financial Hubs

Major European fund domiciles and administration centres such as Luxembourg, Dublin, Zurich, and Frankfurt are at the heart of the continent’s investment fund industry. The efficiency of their operations, particularly in a cross-border context, is heavily reliant on standardised data exchange. FinDatEx templates provide a common data language, facilitating interoperability and reducing operational friction in these key hubs.

In Luxembourg, a leading European domicile for investment funds and a significant centre for ESG-focused products, the European ESG Template (EET) is extensively used. Luxembourg-domiciled funds leverage the EET to provide standardised ESG information to distributors and investors across the European Union, thereby complying with SFDR requirements and supporting the Grand Duchy’s position in sustainable finance. Similarly, the EMT and EPT are vital for MiFID II and PRIIPs compliance for the vast number of funds managed and administered in Luxembourg.

Dublin, another major hub for fund administration and domicile, also benefits significantly from the standardisation offered by FinDatEx. The ability to process regulatory data for MiFID II, PRIIPs, and SFDR using consistent templates like the EMT, EPT, and EET streamlines operations for administrators servicing a diverse international client base and a multitude of fund products distributed across Europe.

Asset managers in Frankfurt, a key financial centre within the Eurozone, utilise templates such as the EMT to disseminate MiFID II-compliant data on costs, charges, and target markets to their distribution networks throughout the EU. This ensures that German-manufactured products can be efficiently integrated into the sales processes of distributors in other member states.

The adoption of these standardised templates significantly reduces the need for bespoke data mapping and interpretation for each individual counterparty or national market. This, in turn, leads to considerable savings in time and resources, minimises the risk of errors in data transmission and regulatory reporting, and enhances overall operational efficiency.

The widespread adoption of FinDatEx templates serves as an important enabler of the specialisation and operational efficiency that characterise these European financial hubs. 

Centres like Luxembourg and Dublin have built their reputations on facilitating cross-border fund business. The seamless exchange of accurate regulatory data is fundamental to the administration, distribution, and oversight of funds that are often managed or serviced in these hubs but marketed and sold across the entire European landscape. By providing a common data language through templates like the EMT, EPT, and EET, FinDatEx significantly reduces the complexity of managing diverse data requirements stemming from multiple jurisdictions and numerous counterparties. 

This standardisation empowers these hubs to process regulatory data with greater efficiency, thereby supporting their distinct specialised roles for example, Luxembourg’s prominence in ESG fund services or Dublin’s extensive fund administration capabilities. In essence, FinDatEx standards indirectly bolster the competitive advantages of these financial centres by lowering the operational barriers to pan-European activity. This allows them to scale their services more effectively and maintain their pivotal positions within the broader European fund ecosystem. Without such harmonised data exchange mechanisms, the operational costs and complexities associated with serving a diverse, multi-jurisdictional market would be substantially higher, potentially hindering growth and efficiency.

 

3.2 The UK and Swiss Nexus: FinDatEx’s Role in Data Exchange with London and Geneva

The influence and utility of FinDatEx templates extend beyond the formal borders of the European Union, playing a significant role in data exchange with major non-EU financial centres like London and Geneva.

 

The Post-Brexit UK Landscape

The United Kingdom’s departure from the EU has introduced regulatory divergence, yet the need for efficient data exchange persists. UK firms distributing products into the EU, and EU firms marketing into the UK, must still navigate the respective regulatory frameworks and exchange relevant data. London’s continued importance as a global financial centre means that UK-based asset managers and distributors frequently interact with European counterparts.

FinDatEx has demonstrated adaptability in this evolving landscape. For instance, versions of the European MiFID Template, specifically EMT V4.1 and V4.2, have been updated to include UK-specific sections. These sections address distinct UK regulations such as the Consumer Duty, which imposes higher standards of care on financial services firms dealing with retail clients. This allows firms to use a largely consistent template structure while still catering to specific UK data requirements, thereby facilitating smoother data flows despite the differing regulatory regimes.

 

The Swiss Context

Switzerland, though not an EU member, has a highly integrated financial sector with strong ties to the EU market. Swiss financial institutions, particularly those in hubs like Geneva and Zurich, often manage or distribute funds intended for EU investors or interact extensively with EU-based counterparties. For these institutions, adopting FinDatEx standards is crucial for ensuring seamless data exchange and aligning with EU regulatory expectations, such as those under SFDR or PRIIPs.

For example, Swiss-based asset managers and service providers utilise the European ESG Template (EET) to provide standardised ESG data to their EU distributors and clients, facilitating compliance with SFDR disclosure pass-through requirements. Industry bodies such as the Asset Management Association Switzerland (AMAS) actively participate in European discussions concerning fund data standards, underscoring the importance of these templates for the Swiss market.

The continued relevance and adaptation of FinDatEx templates in the context of the UK and Swiss markets demonstrate their function as a “lingua franca” in an increasingly complex and, in some areas, fragmenting regulatory world. Brexit has undeniably led to regulatory divergence between the UK and the EU. Switzerland, while maintaining its own regulatory framework, often seeks alignment with EU standards to ensure market access and operational compatibility. 

Despite these political and regulatory shifts, the fundamental need for efficient, standardised data exchange for cross-border fund operations remains paramount. FinDatEx templates, by incorporating UK-specific adaptations (as seen in EMT V4.2) or by being voluntarily adopted by Swiss firms for their EU-facing activities, are proving their capacity to serve as a common data exchange framework even where direct regulatory harmonisation is diminished or absent. This adaptability enhances their strategic importance for financial institutions with international operations, enabling them to leverage a largely consistent data exchange mechanism across different, and sometimes diverging, regulatory environments.

 

3.3 Broader Benefits: Enhancing Data Quality, Efficiency, Transparency, and Reducing Costs

The adoption of FinDatEx templates across the European fund industry yields a range of significant benefits that extend beyond mere regulatory compliance:

  • Improved Data Quality and Consistency: By providing a common framework and defined data fields, FinDatEx templates reduce the likelihood of errors, misinterpretations, and inconsistencies in data exchanged between market participants. This leads to more reliable data for decision-making and reporting.
  • Increased Operational Efficiency: Standardisation allows for the automation of data exchange processes. Product manufacturers can generate data in a single, recognised format, and distributors can ingest this data more easily into their systems. This reduces manual intervention, saves time, and lowers operational costs.
  • Enhanced Transparency: The clear structure and defined data points within the templates make it easier for all market participants to understand and interpret the information being shared. This is particularly important for complex disclosures related to costs, target markets, risks, and ESG factors.
  • Reduced Costs: The combined effects of improved data quality, increased efficiency through automation, and reduced manual effort contribute to overall cost reductions for businesses involved in the fund data ecosystem.
  • Streamlined Regulatory Alignment and Compliance: Ultimately, the primary driver for FinDatEx is to help firms comply with the multifaceted European regulatory landscape. By providing standardised formats for required data, the templates simplify the process of meeting obligations under MiFID II, PRIIPs, SFDR, and Solvency II, thereby promoting market stability and confidence.

 

These advantages are particularly crucial for the European fund industry, which is characterised by its high degree of regulation, extensive cross-border activity, and the sheer volume of data that needs to be managed and exchanged.

The value derived from FinDatEx templates is amplified by a network effect inherent in standardisation. As an increasing number of firms both data suppliers like asset managers and data consumers like distributors and platforms adopt these common data structures, the collective benefits grow. Data providers can reach a wider audience of distributors using a single, standardised format, while data consumers can integrate information from a multitude of sources with significantly less bespoke development and mapping effort. 

This widespread adoption, in turn, encourages technology vendors and service providers (such as AssetIdBridge and others active in the regulatory technology space) to build solutions and services centred around these standards. This further reinforces the templates’ utility and value proposition, creating a virtuous cycle. The collective industry investment in understanding, implementing, and maintaining these templates fosters a shared knowledge base and a more interconnected, efficient European fund market. Consequently, new entrants or firms looking to expand their cross-border activities are strongly incentivised to adopt these standards to seamlessly integrate into the existing data exchange ecosystem, thereby reducing barriers to entry and promoting broader market competition.

Section 4: Mastering FinDatEx: Implementation Challenges and Strategic Best Practices

While FinDatEx templates offer substantial benefits by standardising data exchange, their implementation and ongoing management present a unique set of challenges for financial institutions. Navigating these hurdles effectively requires a strategic approach, robust data governance, and a commitment to staying abreast of the templates’ continuous evolution.

 

4.1 Common Hurdles: Data Sourcing, Quality Management, Version Control, and Technical Integration

Financial firms engaging with FinDatEx templates frequently encounter several operational and technical obstacles:

  • Data Sourcing and Availability: A primary challenge lies in obtaining reliable, comprehensive, and sufficiently granular data to populate the templates, especially for newer and more complex requirements such as the detailed ESG metrics mandated by SFDR (e.g., Principal Adverse Impacts, EU Taxonomy alignment data). Firms may find that their existing data sources are incomplete, or that data from third-party providers exhibits gaps, inconsistencies, or lacks the required level of detail.
  • Data Quality and Consistency: Ensuring the accuracy and consistency of data across hundreds of fields within a single template, and across multiple templates (EMT, EPT, EET, TPT), is a significant undertaking. Errors or inconsistencies in the populated data can lead to incorrect regulatory disclosures, misinformed investment decisions, and potential compliance breaches.
  • Version Control and Template Updates: FinDatEx templates are dynamic and subject to frequent updates in response to regulatory changes, new interpretations, or industry feedback. Managing these evolving versions, tracking publication dates, understanding the changes between versions, implementing updates in internal systems, and adhering to decommissioning dates for older versions, requires robust change management and version control processes. The European ESG Template (EET), for example, has seen multiple versions (V1.0, V1.1, V1.1.1, V1.1.2, V1.1.3) released in a relatively short timeframe, each with specific implementation timelines and transition periods.
  • Technical Integration: Integrating the data flows associated with FinDatEx templates into existing IT infrastructures and operational workflows can be a complex and resource-intensive task. Firms may need to develop new interfaces, adapt existing systems, or implement specialised software solutions to handle the generation, validation, dissemination, and consumption of template data. Furthermore, different organisations within the value chain may employ varying technical delivery methods, adding another layer of complexity to ensure seamless end-to-end integration.
  • Volume of Data Points: Some templates, notably the EET, contain a very large number of data fields (the EET has approximately 600 fields). Managing the collection, validation, and population of such a high volume of data points for each financial product is a demanding operational challenge.
  • Interpretation of Requirements: Ambiguities in regulatory texts or differing interpretations of how these regulations translate into specific data fields within the templates can lead to inconsistencies in how firms populate the information. While FinDatEx and industry bodies like TISA provide guidance, some level of interpretative challenge can remain, particularly with new or evolving disclosure areas.

 

The drive towards standardisation, while beneficial, introduces its own set of managerial complexities. FinDatEx templates aim to simplify the exchange of data by providing common formats. However, the very act of managing these standards dealing with the extensive volume of data points, the rapid succession of template updates driven by regulatory flux, and the continuous need for accurate interpretation and implementation creates new operational and technical challenges for firms. 

Successfully leveraging FinDatEx templates necessitates significant and ongoing investment in robust data governance frameworks, appropriate technology solutions, and specialised expertise. This implies that while the external data exchange process becomes more standardised, the internal processes required to produce, manage, and consume this standardised data must become increasingly sophisticated and resource-aware. This can pose a particular challenge for smaller firms with more limited resources, potentially driving demand for third-party solutions and expert consulting services to bridge these capability gaps.

 

4.2 Strategic Approaches: Establishing Robust Data Governance and Staying Abreast of Template Evolution

To effectively manage FinDatEx templates and mitigate the associated challenges, financial institutions should adopt a strategic and proactive approach centred on robust data governance and continuous adaptation:

  • Establish Strong Data Governance: Implementing a comprehensive data governance framework is paramount. This should include clearly defined data ownership and responsibilities, robust data quality controls and validation processes at various stages, comprehensive audit trails for all data transformations and submissions, and clear policies for data lineage and metadata management.
  • Collaborate with Data Providers and Technology Vendors: Firms can significantly benefit from leveraging the expertise and solutions offered by specialist data vendors and regulatory technology (RegTech) providers. These partners can assist with sourcing hard-to-get data (especially ESG data), validating data accuracy, automating template population, and providing platforms that stay current with the latest template versions and regulatory changes.
  • Invest in Automation: Automating data collection, transformation, validation, template population, and dissemination processes wherever feasible can yield substantial improvements in efficiency, accuracy, and timeliness, while reducing the risk of manual errors.
  • Continuously Monitor FinDatEx Resources: It is crucial to regularly monitor the official FinDatEx website (findatex.eu) for announcements regarding new template versions, public consultations, final publications, and any accompanying guidance or FAQs. Subscribing to updates and participating in consultation processes can provide early insights into upcoming changes.
  • Develop Internal Training and Expertise: Cultivating in-house understanding of the FinDatEx templates, the underlying regulations they serve, and the specific data requirements is essential. This involves training relevant staff in compliance, operations, and IT departments to ensure they can correctly interpret and manage the data flows.
  • Adopt a Phased Implementation and Agile Approach: When new templates are introduced or existing ones undergo significant revisions, a phased implementation approach can be beneficial, allowing firms to manage the transition more effectively. Employing agile methodologies can also help organisations adapt more quickly to the frequent changes in templates and regulatory requirements.
  • Leverage Industry Best Practices: Referencing guidance documents produced by industry bodies, such as The Investing and Savings Alliance (TISA)’s Best Practice Guide for the EET, can provide valuable practical advice and insights for completing and managing the templates.

 

Successfully navigating the complexities of FinDatEx templates requires firms to view their implementation not merely as a tactical compliance exercise, but as an integral component of a broader, strategic data initiative. The demands of sourcing, validating, managing versions, and ensuring the quality of data for these templates inherently push organisations towards a more holistic and sophisticated approach to their overall data management practices. Implementing robust data governance, investing in automation and suitable technologies, and fostering internal expertise are not just solutions for FinDatEx templates; they are foundational elements of a sound, modern data strategy. 

The challenges presented by FinDatEx can, therefore, act as a powerful catalyst for firms to modernise their enterprise data infrastructure and governance frameworks. Organisations that embrace this perspective are more likely to derive enduring benefits that extend beyond template-specific compliance, enhancing their data quality, operational efficiency, and regulatory agility across all facets of their business.

 

4.3 Summary of Current FinDatEx Template Versions and Key Update Drivers

To assist compliance officers, fund administrators, and data management professionals in navigating the FinDatEx landscape, the following table summarises the current active versions of the core templates and the primary drivers behind their latest updates, based on information available from FinDatEx. It is crucial to always refer to the official FinDatEx website for the most current information and definitive template files.

Template Name (Acronym)

Current Active Version(s) (FinDatEx Source)

Date of Latest Version Publication (FinDatEx Source)

Key Regulatory Driver(s) / Purpose of Latest Update

European MiFID Template (EMT)

V4.2 (Mandatory in UK from June 30, 2024; V4.1 retired for UK). V4.0 & V4.2 can be used in parallel for products not distributed in UK.

EMT V4.2: April 22, 2024

EMT V4.2: UK Consumer Duty compliance, detailed ongoing cost requirements for the UK market. EMT V4.1 (April 2023): UK Consumer Duty, PRIIPs transaction cost methodology divergence.

European PRIIPs Template (EPT)

V2.1 (Coexists with V2.0. V2.1 for UK PRIIPs regime).

EPT V2.1: September 23, 2022 (Editorial update Oct 12, 2022).

EPT V2.1: Addresses new UK PRIIPs regime post-Brexit. EPT V2.0 (Feb 2022): Alignment with revised EU PRIIPs Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS).

European ESG Template (EET)

V1.1.3 (Recommended use from Jan 1, 2025; V1.1.2 to be decommissioned from July 1, 2025). V1.1.2 (Usable from Dec 31, 2023).

EET V1.1.3: December 18, 2024.

EET V1.1.3: ESMA fund naming guidelines, PAB/CTB compliance, German MiFID ESG target market concept update. EET V1.1.2 (Dec 2023): Typo corrections, PAI field status changes, new fields for PAI frequency & sovereign investment list.

Tripartite Template (TPT) (Solvency II)

V7.0 (Available from April 2025, effective March 31, 2025. Parallel use with V6 in Q2 2025; full adoption of V7 by July 2025 recommended).

TPT V7.0: December 17, 2024.

TPT V7.0: Alignment with recent Solvency II regulatory changes, enhanced SCR calculations (callable bonds, PIK features, infrastructure), dual NACE codification (V2.0 & V2.1), data description refinements.

Note: This table provides a summary based on available information as of early 2025. Users must always consult the official FinDatEx website (findatex.eu) for the definitive latest versions and guidance.

Section 5: The Future of Standardised Fund Data and Partnering for Success

The landscape of European fund data is one of continuous evolution, shaped by regulatory imperatives and the industry’s drive for efficiency and transparency. FinDatEx standards have become integral to this landscape, and their role is set to endure and adapt as new challenges and opportunities emerge.

 

5.1 The Evolving Regulatory Horizon and the Enduring Value of FinDatEx Standards

European financial regulation is far from static. Existing frameworks like MiFID II, PRIIPs, SFDR, and Solvency II are subject to periodic reviews and amendments, which will inevitably necessitate further adaptations to the corresponding FinDatEx templates. The trend across these regulations is consistently towards increased data granularity, driven by the objectives of enhancing investor protection, improving market transparency, and enabling more sophisticated risk management.

In this dynamic environment, the established FinDatEx framework provides a crucial mechanism for the European fund industry to adapt to future regulatory changes in a coordinated and efficient manner. Rather than individual firms or national associations developing disparate solutions, FinDatEx offers a collaborative platform for evolving data standards collectively. This approach minimises fragmentation and reduces the overall compliance burden on the industry.

Furthermore, the push towards greater digitalisation and automation within the fund industry relies heavily on the existence of standardised, machine-readable data formats. FinDatEx templates are foundational in this regard, supporting not only current operational efficiencies but also paving the way for future initiatives. For example, the data structured by these templates could potentially feed into broader European data initiatives like the European Single Access Point (ESAP), which aims to provide centralised access to public financial and sustainability-related information from EU companies and investment products.

The FinDatEx initiative acts as a significant stabilising force within this constantly shifting regulatory environment. The European regulatory landscape is known for its ongoing evolution and increasing layers of complexity. In the absence of a collaborative standardisation body like FinDatEx, each new wave of regulation or significant amendment to existing rules could trigger a cascade of fragmented, costly, and inefficient data exchange solutions across the industry. This would amplify compliance burdens and hinder interoperability. 

FinDatEx, through its established governance structure, dedicated technical working groups, and transparent consultation processes, offers a consistent, predictable, and industry-driven mechanism for adapting data exchange standards to these changes. This proactive and coordinated approach enables the industry to absorb regulatory shocks more efficiently and maintain a crucial degree of stability and predictability in its data operations. Therefore, FinDatEx is more than just a publisher of data templates; it represents a vital piece of market infrastructure that enhances the European fund industry’s overall resilience and adaptability in the face of relentless regulatory change. Its existence helps to mitigate systemic operational risks associated with the complex web of regulatory data exchange.

 

5.2 Empowering Your Organisation: Leveraging Expertise to Navigate FinDatEx Implementation

Successfully implementing and maintaining compliance with FinDatEx templates is a complex undertaking that requires a sophisticated blend of regulatory knowledge, data management expertise, and robust technical capabilities. The sheer volume of data, the frequency of template updates, and the nuances of regulatory interpretation mean that many firms can benefit from external support.

Strategic partnerships with specialist service providers can be invaluable. These providers offer a range of solutions, including advanced data mapping tools, automated validation services, template population engines, and ongoing monitoring to ensure that firms stay current with the latest template versions and regulatory interpretations. By leveraging such expertise, financial institutions can streamline their FinDatEx compliance processes, reduce operational risk, and free up internal resources to focus on core business activities.

Understanding and effectively implementing FinDatEx standards is no longer a niche concern but a fundamental requirement for operational excellence and regulatory adherence in the modern European fund industry. Organisations that can efficiently manage these data flows are better positioned for growth, cross-border distribution, and meeting the evolving expectations of clients and regulators. As the landscape of fund data continues to become more complex and interconnected, the ability to navigate these standards proficiently will be a key differentiator. Platforms and consulting services focused on fund data interoperability and regulatory data strategy can play a crucial role in helping organisations master these challenges, transforming regulatory obligations into opportunities for enhanced data management and operational efficiency.

Conclusion

FinDatEx has unequivocally established itself as a cornerstone of the European fund industry’s data exchange infrastructure. Born out of a pressing need for standardisation in the face of increasingly complex EU regulations like MiFID II, PRIIPs, SFDR, and Solvency II, this industry-led initiative has delivered a suite of invaluable templates—most notably the EMT, EPT, EET, and TPT. These tools are instrumental in facilitating regulatory compliance, enhancing operational efficiency, improving data quality, and fostering transparency across a diverse range of market participants, from asset managers in Frankfurt and Luxembourg to distributors and insurers across the continent and in key international hubs like London and Geneva.

The journey of FinDatEx and its templates reflects a pragmatic and adaptive response to regulatory pressures. The collaborative, transparent, and iterative development process, involving numerous European financial associations and technical experts, has ensured that the templates are both robust and practical. However, the very success and indispensability of these standards bring ongoing challenges. Firms must grapple with the sheer volume of data points, particularly in newer templates like the EET, manage the complexities of frequent version updates driven by regulatory evolution, ensure consistent data quality, and integrate these data flows effectively into their existing technological and operational frameworks.

The evolution of templates like the EMT, with UK-specific sections, or the EPT, accommodating distinct EU and UK PRIIPs regimes, highlights FinDatEx’s role as a crucial data bridge in an environment of increasing regulatory nuance and, in some cases, divergence. Similarly, the rapid iteration of the EET underscores the dynamic nature of sustainable finance regulation and the industry’s accelerated efforts to build mature ESG data capabilities.

Mastering FinDatEx templates requires more than a tick-box compliance approach; it demands a strategic commitment to robust data governance, investment in appropriate technology and automation, continuous monitoring of regulatory and template developments, and the cultivation of internal expertise. For many, partnering with specialist solution providers will be key to navigating this complex landscape efficiently.

Looking ahead, the value of FinDatEx standards is set to endure. As European financial regulation continues to evolve, the established FinDatEx framework will provide an essential mechanism for the industry to adapt in a coordinated and cost-effective manner. These standardised, machine-readable templates are not just tools for current compliance; they are foundational elements for the ongoing digitalisation and enhanced interoperability of the European fund market. By demystifying these technical standards and promoting best practices in their implementation, the industry can collectively enhance its resilience, efficiency, and capacity to serve investors effectively in an increasingly data-driven world.

References

  1. www.esma.europa.eu, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/consultations/2019/09/ebf_final_response_to_esma_call_for_evidence_costs_and_inducements_sept_2019.pdf
  2. Members & resources – FinDatEx, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://findatex.eu/about/members-and-resources
  3. FinDatEx, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://findatex.eu/about
  4. Privacy Statement – FinDatEx, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://findatex.eu/privacy-statement
  5. EU financial services organisations launch FinDatEx platform to improve data exchange – EBF – European Banking Federation, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.ebf.eu/financing-growth/eu-financial-services-organisations-launch-findatex-platform-to-improve-data-exchange/
  6. White Paper – Ringfencing – openfunds, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://openfunds.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/White-paper_Ringfencing_v1.1_20200901.pdf
  7. News – FinDatEx, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://findatex.eu/news
  8. Data Delivery Frameworks – The Investment Association, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.theia.org/industry-policy/guidelines/data-delivery-frameworks
  9. FinDatEx-platform-launches-EMT-V3-standardising-data-sharing-under-MIFID-2 | EFAMA, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.efama.org/newsroom/news/findatex-platform-launches-emt-v3-standardising-data-sharing-under-mifid-2
  10. MiFID II – LSEG, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.lseg.com/en/data-analytics/mifid
  11. ESMA_CP_SFDR_Review_2_D, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/webform/200622/94885/ESMA_CP_SFDR_Review_2_Degrees_Investing_Initiative.docx
  12. openfunds newsletter 29, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://openfunds.org/info/news/openfunds-newsletter-29/
  13. FinDatEx platform launches EMT V3 standardising data sharing under MIFID 2 – EBF, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.ebf.eu/market-securities/findatex-platform-launches-emt-v3-standardising-data-sharing-under-mifid-2/
  14. Response to ESMA consultation on guidelines on sustainability aspects of the MiFID II suitability requirements – International Swaps and Derivatives Association, accessed on May 26, 2025, https://www.isda.org/a/muVgE/ISDA-AFME-Response-to-ESMA-consultation-paper-on-ESG-suitability-guidelines.pdf